Several issues addressed in this PR:
- CutFilament tuning + error recovery
- introduce register 0x1d (cut filament selector iRun current level)
- optimize setting iRun and iHold currents in the FW
- CutFilament unit test fixed
The reasons for this change are:
- NoCommand is used during the lifetime of the firmware as a fallback in case an unknown command is received (simplifies command handling code). It must remain not doing anything.
- StartUp became a complex infrastructure which needs to "live" until an error is fixed (if any). That requires a "standard" StateInner() function which waits for the user to resolve the error.
Unit tests renamed as well.
Intended for scenarios when FINDA used to be OFF but accidentally became ON without a reason.
The user is obliged to inspect FINDA and tune its switching.
If FSENSOR_DIDNT_SWITCH_ON was caused by misaligned Idler, rehoming it may fix the issue when auto retrying -> no user intervention.
So first invalidate homing flags as the user may have moved the Idler or Selector accidentally.
Beware: we may run into issues when FINDA or FSensor do not work correctly. Selector may rely on the presumed filament position and actually cut it accidentally when trying to rehome.
It is yet to be seen if something like this can actually happen.
MMU-191
This PR is a different solution to what @gudnimg found in PR#233 / PFW-1404.
The benefit of this approach is the fact, that the button press event is generated when the button is pressed and not after it has been released.
The downside is obvious:
CPUFLASH: +28B
RAM: +1B
- rename stall*guard to StallGuard (match name with the vendor)
- separate TMC2130 module from EEPROM (they do not need to know about each other at all)
- separate SGTHRS settings from motion - moved to globals like all other "global" parameters
- improved EEPROM storage for SGTHRS
This is to solve a potential problem while feeding to printer's drive gears - while disengaging the Idler, the Pulley was still rotating to avoid grinding the filament (printer is pulling it).
Other filaments could have moved a bit when the Idler's bearings ran over them while the Pulley was still rotating slowly -> the filament could have been moved into the Selector's path causing trouble (especially when not used in the print).
Therefore, the Idler disengages partially now - moves into an intermediate position between the slots.
Then, the Pulley is completely stopped and after that the Idler does a full disengage like before.
It looks we have some kind of leak when filament sensor state is not completely coherent with FINDA state.
This is yet to be discovered and fixed with some unit tests.
If the MMU receives a command LoadFilament with a slot number SL we reject
the command to avoid moving the selector (effectively cutting the piece of filament present in FINDA).
That includes the scenario when the selector is standing at the very same slot SL, because the filament could be held by the printer (i.e. loaded in the nozzle).
There is one special case though - same slot AND filament load state == InSelector (it MUST NOT be anywhere farther)
It turned out FINDA needs running timer to perform BlockingInit() correctly.
Therefore setup() was split into setup() (no IRQ) and setup2() (IRQ enabled).
Then, finally, the check for FINDA state became reliable upon start of the FW.
Originally, only FeedingToBondtech was reported to the printer.
With PR#173 we have this operation separated into a fast and a slow stage (for MK3S with the chimney).
It looks like the printer could benefit from knowing if the MMU is still pushing fast
or when it entered the slow stage (to prevent ramming hard the Bondtech gears)
Along with this new state being reported, we also introduce a new ErrorCode::FSENSOR_TOO_EARLY
which basically means that the fsensor triggered in the fast feeding stage.
- Check rates using the reported acceleration instead of deriving the
value from the slope.
- Simplify the tolerances when checking (use 10% for single-axis,
20% with multiple due to quantization)
- Check a broader range of values
Correctly compute both the number of steps and direction when
under/overflowing the current position by performing a relative move.
This makes a repeated PlanMove() _always_ perform the move correcly,
even when the upper-level code might require to handle the overflow
itself for measurement.
Add tests for this condition by exposing the internal CurBlockShift() to
the motion unit tests.
D.R.racer
Guðni Már Gilbert
Yuri D'Elia
Alex Voinea
vintagepc